Re:Stanford's “Elimination of Harmful Language” Initiative
by tsimionescu on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @10:20AM
(#34067072)
The use of "Latinx" is one of the best examples of just how disconnected these people are from those they seek to represent/protect.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Stanford's “Elimination of Harmful Language” Initiative
by rayiner on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @10:28AM
(#34067191)
The discourse around policing is another one. Eric Adams addressed this in his recent op ed on moving the Democratic primary to South Carolina: https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/13/opinions/democrats-2024-prima.... Adams writes that the move could help “address[] the concerns of all people of color and working-class people, many of whom feel the party has misrepresented their beliefs.”
Adams is talking about white political elites rather than white academics, but as Elizabeth Warren illustrates, there’s a lot of ideological overlap between the two.
Re:Stanford's “Elimination of Harmful Language” Initiative
by MockObject on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @11:17AM
(#34067984)
"Latinx" also proves that the motivation is grounded in bad faith, for if someone were truly offended by the gendered term "Latino", they would surely use "Latin" instead of creating an ostentatious monstrosity that is totally alien to both English and Spanish.
Re:Stanford's “Elimination of Harmful Language” Initiative
by ZeroGravitas on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @11:38AM
(#34068334)
Or, like the people who came up with :-), lmfao, wtf, l33t, pwned!!!111!1 and similar internet shortcuts, they were communicating in a text only medium and didn't need to worry about pronunciation?