Re:Ask HN: Why do Apple and Google watches have such bad bat...
by tmpburning on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @12:14AM
(#34061813)
Because tracking you is their first priority...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ask HN: Why do Apple and Google watches have such bad bat...
by gnicholas on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @12:22AM
(#34061867)
So I have wondered about this, but it doesn't explain why the battery life would be better — unless the idea is that they're losing money on the devices by using advanced batteries because they want to track you.
Regardless, I don't give the Amazfit (Zepp) app access to my location, and the watch itself doesn't have wifi connectivity. I suppose they can see my IP address when the app phones home, but I don't really care that the company knows my approximate location.
Re:Ask HN: Why do Apple and Google watches have such bad bat...
by missedthecue on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @12:28AM
(#34061921)
??
GPS uses very little battery.
Re:Ask HN: Why do Apple and Google watches have such bad bat...
by beardyw on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @03:22AM
(#34063097)
That's a strange assertion. Devices use WiFi positioning whenever possible to avoid using GPS. Do you have some reason for saying that?
Re:Ask HN: Why do Apple and Google watches have such bad bat...
by missedthecue on Tuesday December 20, 2022 @12:03PM
(#34068720)
WiFi position also uses very little battery. And are you under the misconception that offbrand watches don't have location functions?