The target application is somewhat different. FILM is more focused on high quality animation generation while nvfruc is for real-time streaming.

Yea but this is irrelevent unless you implying that FILM is better quality while nvfruc is lower quality but faster so applicable for realtime?

if nvfruc is better quality + faster then the comparison is that nvfruc is better.

nvfruc is extremely limited in its capability, basically small motion interpolation between two frames within a very short interval. FILM (and other deep learning based interpolation methods) is capable of interpolating two frames with large motion differences at a significantly larger computational cost. I don't understand why you're trying to imply nvfruc could be better at both cost and quality? Even Nvidia won't make such bold claims.

Thanks.