News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Unluckiest Man in Movie History (2000) by johncessna on Sunday December 18, 2022 @06:06PM (#34045191)
Unlucky? I mean, unlucky to be born when he was I guess.

Otherwise, he did a thing, was told not to do a thing, then went ahead and did it anyways and had the book thrown at him. That was his choice, not some stroke of bad luck.

Re:The Unluckiest Man in Movie History (2000) by scrubs on Sunday December 18, 2022 @06:42PM (#34045799)
Huh? That's not elucidating anything; it's not even a cursory summary. Big dogs eat little dogs isn't help.

Let's start here: what's legal isn't always ethical and vice versa. Second, when legal vs ethical goes sideways, the state has force. Individual's don't. That's important too. Finally what about fear as a basic component of human nature.

I'll leave it this way. Firefly the TV series played this up nice:

- escorts + paid sex was legal even a status card

- theft wasn't esp against the "man"

Mal wasn't having any of that because law enforcer wasn't legit as he saw it. Now what?

Re:The Unluckiest Man in Movie History (2000) by rosywoozlechan on Sunday December 18, 2022 @09:40PM (#34047670)
He stood up against censorship, seems laudable and deserves more in my estimation than an attitude of "well that's what you get"
Re:The Unluckiest Man in Movie History (2000) by johncessna on Monday December 19, 2022 @07:58AM (#34051514)
I didn't say it wasn't. I said luck wasn't a factor.
Re:The Unluckiest Man in Movie History (2000) by JoeAltmaier on Monday December 19, 2022 @09:39AM (#34052523)
...during wartime. The rules change a bit then. He knew that. I have little regard for those kind of heroics - self-aggrandizing and counterproductive.