News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Stanford's “Elimination of Harmful Language” Initiative. Parent comment

Re:Stanford's “Elimination of Harmful Language” Initiative by gpderetta on Sunday December 18, 2022 @01:21PM (#34040689)
We were always at war with C++
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stanford's “Elimination of Harmful Language” Initiative by ohCh6zos on Sunday December 18, 2022 @01:36PM (#34040965)
The proper term is double-plus-C
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stanford's “Elimination of Harmful Language” Initiative by oxfeed65261 on Monday December 19, 2022 @09:09PM (#34060676)
…then what is double-plus-un-C? A lisp? (and is “lisp” problematic?)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stanford's “Elimination of Harmful Language” Initiative by cudgy on Sunday December 18, 2022 @01:37PM (#34040979)
Violation. Using the term “we” implies agreement among all present.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stanford's “Elimination of Harmful Language” Initiative by return_to_monke on Sunday December 18, 2022 @03:28PM (#34042819)
correct. only big brother must agree.
[ Parent | on HN ]