News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Next, Nest, Nuxt Nust? by samuelstros on Sunday December 18, 2022 @05:42AM (#34036486)
I recently discovered and recommend to take a look at vite-plugin-ssr https://vite-plugin-ssr.com/.

Vite-plugin-ssr describes itself as "Like Next.js/Nuxt but as do-one-thing-do-it-well Vite plugin.". I use it for https://github.com/inlang/inlang. The control and ownership of the underlying rendering techniques is truly relieving and enables us to run static sites + a high dynamic (client-side rendered) app in one monolith instead of the typical static site + app.domain.com split.

Re:Next, Nest, Nuxt Nust? by fiala__ on Sunday December 18, 2022 @06:24AM (#34036722)
thank you, I've recently been searching for an alternative to Nuxt that isn't a heavy black box, so this looks very interesting!
Re:Next, Nest, Nuxt Nust? by antifa on Sunday December 18, 2022 @01:26PM (#34040785)
I wish more SPA frameworks (and any backend frameworks) had automatically generated routes like nuxt.
Re:Next, Nest, Nuxt Nust? by stoicjumbotron on Sunday December 18, 2022 @07:15AM (#34036994)
Any issues or gotachas you've run into as compared to Next?
Re:Next, Nest, Nuxt Nust? by samuelstros on Sunday December 18, 2022 @12:09PM (#34039715)
- The documentation is good but not "amazing" - the surface api for routing is large (different ways to achieve routing). the maintainer is working on reducing the surface area though https://github.com/brillout/vite-plugin-ssr/issues/53#issuec... - api routes (cloud functions) require another package (on purpose). see https://telefunc.com/ from the same maintainer

other than that, no gatchas i encountered. i would choose vite-plugin-ssr again.