Re:Abandoned: The human cost of neurotechnology failure
by noobermin on Saturday December 17, 2022 @08:44PM
(#34034248)
Or even better, if the company fails to fulfill their obligation, their patent and proprietary information is automatically obtained by the government. If they subsidize, there should be strings.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Abandoned: The human cost of neurotechnology failure
by BurningFrog on Saturday December 17, 2022 @09:25PM
(#34034489)
I see how that would help the government, but not how it would help the patients.
Re:Abandoned: The human cost of neurotechnology failure
by heavyset_go on Saturday December 17, 2022 @09:44PM
(#34034605)
Opening the proprietary information allows patients to take control of their health, and gives more options for doctors to help them, and for groups who might take up the helm of maintaining or removing implants from existing patients. It also allows iteration upon the design, so that it may be improved even if the original company was unable to improve it themselves.
Re:Abandoned: The human cost of neurotechnology failure
by tick_tock_tick on Saturday December 17, 2022 @10:42PM
(#34034834)
They said the government now owns the patent your responding like they said the patent is now voided and the technology is open to anyone.
Re:Abandoned: The human cost of neurotechnology failure
by heavyset_go on Saturday December 17, 2022 @10:49PM
(#34034872)
Do you think the government is going to sit atop of a giant pile of patents like a fire-breathing dragon protecting its hoard?
That's what private companies currently do, and by relinquishing them to the government, the public has some say in what happens to them.
Re:Abandoned: The human cost of neurotechnology failure
by tick_tock_tick on Saturday December 17, 2022 @10:51PM
(#34034891)
Probably not but who they chose to license it too might not be in the patients best interest.
Re:Abandoned: The human cost of neurotechnology failure
by heavyset_go on Sunday December 18, 2022 @10:55PM
(#34048269)
I agree, but I think it's better than the alternative of it remaining with some patent troll to never be used in a productive way. If it remains in private hands, we don't get a say in what happens to it. If the government owns it, there's at least a chance that democratic processes can affect what happens to it and standards can be enforced that licensees must meet or adhere to.
There are plenty of NIH patents that are licensed, and while some of the companies they're licensed to make my skin crawl, they're at least being used productively, and not locked away to be used as a cudgel in a legal racket.
Re:Abandoned: The human cost of neurotechnology failure
by concordDance on Sunday December 18, 2022 @05:37AM
(#34036457)
> Do you think the government is going to sit atop of a giant pile of patents like a fire-breathing dragon protecting its hoard?
Very likely unless some distribution or maintenance mechanism gets funded.
Re:Abandoned: The human cost of neurotechnology failure
by heavyset_go on Sunday December 18, 2022 @10:59PM
(#34048292)
It already exists: https://www.techtransfer.nih.gov/
Re:Abandoned: The human cost of neurotechnology failure
by tracker1 on Sunday December 18, 2022 @10:54AM
(#34038813)
More likely they auction it off to the highest bidder.
Re:Abandoned: The human cost of neurotechnology failure
by heavyset_go on Sunday December 18, 2022 @10:55PM
(#34048275)
NIH regularly licenses patents, so that doesn't have to be the case.