News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:3.3 million e-mails between the most powerful men are abo... by jasondrowley on Wednesday December 28, 2011 @09:12PM (#3402265)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm under the impression that government employees' correspondence with a private company is confidential.
Re:3.3 million e-mails between the most powerful men are abo... by quanticle on Wednesday December 28, 2011 @09:18PM (#3402276)
Is it? If it is, it shouldn't be. If the matter concerns clear and present threats to national security, then why is a private firm involved at all? If there is no clear and present threat, then why bother with secrecy?
Re:3.3 million e-mails between the most powerful men are abo... by devs1010 on Wednesday December 28, 2011 @09:33PM (#3402318)
We need to take back the concept of the government serving the people, they are our employees, we pay taxes that go towards their salaries, last time I checked, my boss has the ability to read emails I send from a company email address.
Re:3.3 million e-mails between the most powerful men are abo... by jmvoodoo on Wednesday December 28, 2011 @11:09PM (#3402470)
You're wrong. You can foia request any communication between government employees and anyone if it was done in their official role or on government equipment. There are some exceptions of course, but generally speaking correspondence is anything but confidential (at least in the USA)
Re:3.3 million e-mails between the most powerful men are abo... by oasisbob on Wednesday December 28, 2011 @11:56PM (#3402569)
It's really hard to generalize about this in the US, each state has their own laws, FOIA isn't applicable to state and local governments: http://www.nfoic.org/state-foi-laws

The allowable exemptions -- and penalties for non-compliance -- vary wildly from state to state.

Re:3.3 million e-mails between the most powerful men are abo... by jasondrowley on Thursday December 29, 2011 @10:36AM (#3403932)
Thanks for disabusing me of my misconception. However, I'm going to have to do more homework on this before I'm willing to concede that you're right.