News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Peter Norvig critically reviews AlphaCode's code quality by jhedwards on Friday December 16, 2022 @05:28PM (#34021467)
I'm not sure if I'm missing something here, but the fact that I can write my thoughts/thought process down in a form that other people can independently consume and understand seems sufficient proof of their existence to me.
Re:Peter Norvig critically reviews AlphaCode's code quality by space_fountain on Friday December 16, 2022 @05:32PM (#34021511)
Large scale language models can do that too (or rather pretend to) and they’ll only get better at it
Re:Peter Norvig critically reviews AlphaCode's code quality by jpttsn on Saturday December 17, 2022 @04:43AM (#34026355)
You proof is tautological or whatever: it assumes the thing it's trying to prove.

"The fact that I can pray to God and he hears me proves that he exists"