Re:Twitter restored ElonJet account
by poopbutt7 on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @10:56PM
(#33995019)
Sulfur dioxide has a cooling effect. So keep doing that, I guess.
My first web search seems to disagree on those numbers:
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1185535/transport-carbon...
But if everyone just cherry picks a worse example than themselves to justify not doing anything until they are the worst, then no progress will ever happen.
You are making the mistake of thinking that CO2 is the biggest or worst polluter and that only greenhouse pollution matters. Look up sulfur pollution. It is basically non-existent in gasoline, but rampant in other fossil fuels and is far more impactful.
No, CO2 was just the context of the discussion.
I specified I was talking explicitly about sulfur pollution.
FWIW, often statistics talking about CO2 are actually talking about CO2 equivalent, which is a way of normalising the harm levels of different pollutants. Typically this is used to compare things like farming and fossil fuels, which produce very different gases.
Unfortunately, I can't tell if the source linked actually uses this metric but isn't being clear, or if it's just focused on CO2, and I'm struggling to find another source that does use CO2 equivalent emissions as a metric.
Re:Twitter restored ElonJet account
by KingOfCoders on Thursday December 15, 2022 @12:00AM
(#33995409)
One mouse drops more mice hair in nature than all humans (~8B!) combined!
Re:Twitter restored ElonJet account
by hairofadog on Thursday December 15, 2022 @12:01AM
(#33995422)
One mouse do what now?
Re:Twitter restored ElonJet account
by quickthrower2 on Thursday December 15, 2022 @06:07AM
(#33997789)
But they only tested on mice so
we can’t be sure
Your switching from a truck to a car makes effectively ZERO difference in global emissions. If EVERY non-commercial vehicle in the US went down to ZERO pollution, it wouldn't even be noticed in the statistical noise of the country's pollution.