Re:Waymo's collision avoidance testing
by pauljurczak on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @09:47PM
(#33994476)
> Boeing 737 Max, those crashes wouldn't have happened if there were no autopilot systems.
Bad example. MCAS was an obvious case of a criminal corporate behavior, not a tradeoff between overall safety vs. technical perfection.
Re:Waymo's collision avoidance testing
by gitfan86 on Thursday December 15, 2022 @08:16AM
(#33999033)
It doesn't matter, the point is that relying on autopilot will open up crash risks that do not exist with manual flight controls
Re:Waymo's collision avoidance testing
by pauljurczak on Thursday December 15, 2022 @11:27PM
(#34010212)
It does matter! I'm assuming that any sane person, especially a highly trained professional, is not fully relying on automation and has at least some idea of its limitations. In the case of MCAS, corporate fraud distorted the level of trust pilots had in automation, leading to loss of life.
And in fact some regulators fully understand the tradeoffs and will prefer autonomy for the better good of the public. An example of this is the Boeing 737 Max, those crashes wouldn't have happened if there were no autopilot systems. But regulators are not suggesting that all autonomous systems on planes be turned off because of the safety and financial advantages of keeping them in place even though they are obviously not perfect.