CZ, not yet fully aware that he is dealing with an unsophisticated bumbler (and thus the risk that this chat would someday be part of congressional testimony), is talking candidly but at cross purposes with Sammy.
CZ knows (and presumes SBF also knows) how incredibly thin this market's liquidity really is, and thus the potential destabilization that a mere 250k signal could ignite. while Sammy apparently believes something closer to version of the numbers meant for public FOMO consumption.
This little screenshot, (if not eventually proven fabricated, which is almost certainly going to be the counter signal message by CZ, parroted across the crypto community) likely is the biggest bombshell tell in this testimony so far.
SBF: "Are you claiming that 250k of USDT would depeg it?"
CZ: "no, I don't think 100x that size will succeed. It just cause small issues here and there"
Not sure what small issues CZ is referring to, but he's the expert here
What's not being pointed out here is that to CZ, and actually even to Sam, there really is no distinction here between Alameda and FTX. CZ is calling him on a position taken by Alameda, via their "Exchange chat," to coordinate between FTX and Binance.
It was extremely weird for CZ to accuse SBF of trying to depeg Tether with a $250k short. I don't know what to make of that.
Also strange is how CZ asked for group admin permission from another person at FTX and then went right away to asking if anyone objected to removing SBF from the group. I guess the group was managed by FTX and CZ was attempting to take control of it as FTX was collapsing.