About the security content of iOS 16.2 and iPadOS 16.2

Re:About the security content of iOS 16.2 and iPadOS 16.2 by brookst on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @11:53PM (#33980142)

I still don’t understand it. Like, my new toothbrush (“Now removes more plaque!”) should disparage the old model (“fixed bristle design flaw that left pockets of plaque on occlusions near front of mouth where interior bristles were too short”).

But ok. Someone thinks companies should try to paint themselves in the worst possible light because reasons. I guess that’s a take.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:About the security content of iOS 16.2 and iPadOS 16.2 by NoPicklez on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @12:39AM (#33980363)

You've completely missed my opinion on the matter.

I agree with you and that was my point. Tt was the original poster who thought companies should paint themselves in the worst possible light.

I was supporting another commenter who simply explained why it is that companies paint themselves in the best light.

You need to have read my comments in relation to what I was replying to, rather than in isolation.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:About the security content of iOS 16.2 and iPadOS 16.2 by brookst on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @08:45AM (#33983345)

Apologies, I could have been more clear that I was in fact expressing my disagreement with the framing that you relayed, and understood it was not you personally I was disagreeing with.

[ Parent | on HN ]