Sorry, I wasn't clear. What I listed was not in fact what they wrote, but what _I_ would write given this exercise.
What they wrote was (summarizing) that there is not a lot of tooling available, there still isn't API stability, and not many libraries available.
Re:Pony Programming Language
by eyelidlessness on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @05:46AM
(#33981951)
My apologies, I should’ve checked, but maybe you could offer some of these caveats as a contribution. Your language was even convincing enough I thought it was theirs.
As an example from someone who finds the language compelling in some ways, outright ruling out DSLs is a major factor that would rule it out of consideration for me. Better that they saved me the trouble of wondering!