News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:US Department of Energy: Fusion Ignition Achieved by ufmace on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @05:10PM (#33976729)
"Funding" isn't really a good answer IMO. I don't know a ton about Fusion research specifically, but NASA is horrifically inefficient with money compared to private competitors. Giving them more money won't magically make them more efficient. Reasons why include:

- Their incentive is to optimize for political approval, which means spreading facilities among as many congressional districts as possible, which creates a ton of inefficiency from poor communication and the need to constantly ship things around

- Public approval is the goal and failure is the worst possible option, so things tend to be optimized to take as few engineering risks as possible and have huge amounts of bureaucracy to spread the blame for any possible failure

There's a reason why SpaceX started landing rockets with a fraction of the money that NASA spent on building ridiculous boondoggles.

Re:US Department of Energy: Fusion Ignition Achieved by geysersam on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @05:48PM (#33977326)
Also, SpaceX did it 60 years later.
Re:US Department of Energy: Fusion Ignition Achieved by shawn-butler on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @02:45AM (#33981040)
>> Their incentive is to optimize for political approval, which means spreading facilities among as many congressional districts as possible, which creates a ton of inefficiency from poor communication

Ummm.. I thought remote work was no less efficient?

Re:US Department of Energy: Fusion Ignition Achieved by ufmace on Friday December 16, 2022 @06:55PM (#34022357)
Remote work is fine in some circumstances. One of the circumstances where it is definitely not fine is in designing, manufacturing, and testing high-precision aerospace hardware. You aren't gonna put a 5-axis CNC mill in your garage.