Re:US Department of Energy: Fusion Ignition Achieved
by geysersam on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @05:48PM
(#33977326)
Also, SpaceX did it 60 years later.
Re:US Department of Energy: Fusion Ignition Achieved
by shawn-butler on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @02:45AM
(#33981040)
>> Their incentive is to optimize for political approval, which means spreading facilities among as many congressional districts as possible, which creates a ton of inefficiency from poor communication
Ummm.. I thought remote work was no less efficient?
Re:US Department of Energy: Fusion Ignition Achieved
by ufmace on Friday December 16, 2022 @06:55PM
(#34022357)
Remote work is fine in some circumstances. One of the circumstances where it is definitely not fine is in designing, manufacturing, and testing high-precision aerospace hardware. You aren't gonna put a 5-axis CNC mill in your garage.
- Their incentive is to optimize for political approval, which means spreading facilities among as many congressional districts as possible, which creates a ton of inefficiency from poor communication and the need to constantly ship things around
- Public approval is the goal and failure is the worst possible option, so things tend to be optimized to take as few engineering risks as possible and have huge amounts of bureaucracy to spread the blame for any possible failure
There's a reason why SpaceX started landing rockets with a fraction of the money that NASA spent on building ridiculous boondoggles.