News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:US Department of Energy: Fusion Ignition Achieved by krainboltgreene on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @04:10PM (#33975834)
> I can't agree that funding is "largely the reason"

> NASA just isn't about high-risk / high-reward "moonshots" anymore. The overarching political environment doesn't allow it, never mind the office politics.

Why doesn't the political environment allow for it. What could happen. What could regulatory bodies do to NASA for taking a risk and failing. What sort of constricting change could political bodies do in such a situation.

Re:US Department of Energy: Fusion Ignition Achieved by LarryMullins on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @04:31PM (#33976152)
> Why doesn't the political environment allow for it. What could happen.

Three astronauts were incinerated alive. That was when they started to take safety more seriously. Subsequent accidents have only reinforced this.

Re:US Department of Energy: Fusion Ignition Achieved by krainboltgreene on Wednesday December 14, 2022 @05:16AM (#33981812)
Yes, but what happened after the astronauts died as a response?

The entire point of my comment is that funding cuts happened. That is the reaction.

Re:US Department of Energy: Fusion Ignition Achieved by ngcc_hk on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @04:51PM (#33976446)
The funding senator became the administrator of the current moon attempt. The funding insist on using the old technology in the funding. All these sounded bad. If nasa has more freehand. But then the fund will not get back to the states …