Re:US Department of Energy: Fusion Ignition Achieved
by jboy55 on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @02:30PM
(#33974428)
Its actually pretty good, since this is primarily weapons testing. The real money is being spent in the EU, where there is at least a chance of getting a sustainable fusion reaction.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:US Department of Energy: Fusion Ignition Achieved
by davrosthedalek on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @02:56PM
(#33974790)
It's, depending what calculation you believe, around 20 billion for ITER. Started in 2013, first plasma in 2025, first full fusion in 2035. So about a billion per year.
Of course, costs are calculated differently, and I'm not sure on what time scale the 600 million are, but it's not that drastically different.
Research wise, it's a pretty big chunk of money. But yeah, more money in research would be nice. (Disclaimer: I am a scientist with grants.)
Re:US Department of Energy: Fusion Ignition Achieved
by ZeKK14 on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @03:48PM
(#33975540)
ITER is built in France, but is financed by many countries outside of EU, including the USA. It's not a huge cost per-country.
> the ITER Members China, the European Union, India, Japan, Korea, Russia and the United States
Re:US Department of Energy: Fusion Ignition Achieved
by jboy55 on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @03:43PM
(#33975454)
Yes, I think more research towards eventual power generation, rather than weapon testing, would be better.
Re:US Department of Energy: Fusion Ignition Achieved
by jasonhansel on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @05:44PM
(#33977274)
Not really. IIRC the NIF needs to pretend that it's about nuclear weapons to secure DoE funding; they (like us) know that it's really about developing fusion as an energy source.