Re:US Department of Energy: Fusion Ignition Achieved
by pfdietz on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @01:25PM
(#33973402)
What scheme do you imagine that fusion could be used to replace petroleum that would not also work when powered by solar? Production of synfuels using hydrogen, for example, would also deal with solar's intermittency, leaving the energy sources to compete on the basis of levelized cost. The levelized cost of solar has become quite low, and it's very difficult to see how any fusion scheme, and DT fusion in particular, will ever compete.
Re:US Department of Energy: Fusion Ignition Achieved
by orthecreedence on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @01:48PM
(#33973792)
I specifically asked about the production of solar panels. Are you assuming that we already have all the panels we need to replace petrolium sitting in a warehouse? What good is solar in an energy independence plan if we can't build our own panels?
Re:US Department of Energy: Fusion Ignition Achieved
by pfdietz on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @02:02PM
(#33974024)
What? Production of solar panels is just a matter of building and running more factories. There's no significant limit to this.
Re:US Department of Energy: Fusion Ignition Achieved
by Firmwarrior on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @01:28PM
(#33973473)
Nuclear fuel actually isn't that expensive or rare
Those crazy sci-fi stories from the 30s and 50s where everyone used nuclear power (and it was so cheap they didn't bother to meter it) were all completely accurate from a non-political viewpoint
Re:US Department of Energy: Fusion Ignition Achieved
by orthecreedence on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @01:49PM
(#33973808)
Oh, interesting. I read/heard a few places that most fuel used for fission was controlled by a few countries. I was unaware it was abundant.
What alternatives to petrolium does the US have that it does not rely on others for?