https://www.stlouisfed.org/open-vault/2019/january/fed-infla...
They’re only linked due to rehypothecation of money supply which is a problem in an of itself. But it gets a little complex to explain.
Edit: my brain skipped over the ‘cash’ part and assumed ‘risk free’ interest would still be collected.
The real interest rate is the nominal interest rate minus inflation. When there is inflation, the real interest rate for holding cash is negative. When there is no inflation, that real interest rate is 0%. The disincentive to holding cash disappears and therefore more people hold cash.
Yes.
> When there is inflation, the real interest rate for holding cash is negative.
No. This assumes nominal interest rate stays constant which it very much will not do.
This is an absurd claim. Nobody seriously considering mattress vs CD (or bonds in a low rate environment like we had 2008-2020) is swayed by a return of less than a couple percent. It is a security vs liquidity vs trust calculation, not a return based one.
Furthermore, as the other commenter points out, rates are correlated but not necessarily in lock step with inflation. The rate on your savings account is probably still sub 1% (although bonds have gone up).
It isn't the most up-to-date data and survey results are always a little questionable, but here is some data from 2015[1]:
>A new survey of more than 1,800 people from the American Express Spending and Savings Tracker, however, found that 43% of Americans keep their savings in cash. An alarming 53% of those cash-hoarders "plan to hide bills in a secret location at home."
Those numbers are big enough that even if they are way off, there is still a sizable number of people who are holding onto their savings in physical cash. That would go up if there was no inflation.
[1] - https://www.businessinsider.com/americans-hide-money-under-t...