News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fusion energy breakthrough by Livermore Lab by ChuckMcM on Monday December 12, 2022 @05:29PM (#33961353)
This is great! Why is this great? It is great because between magnetic confinement and inertial confinement approaches to fusion generation it is the FIRST one to demonstrate energy gain.

If you are programmer, think of it like your program compiled successfully for the first time. It means that all of the bits between you designing the program, the program being compiled, and the operating system recognizing it as a program, all did what they were supposed to. Of course your program probably doesn't do what you want it to yet, but you have validated a huge chunk of the "pipeline" between what you are trying to do, and doing it with the equipment you have. That is what this is, "hello world" for Fusion Physicists.

And the reason they are so pumped is that they have literally been told for DECADES that why they proposed to do "wasn't possible" (and by that I mean creating actual fusion through inertial confinement.)

Steps 2 - n look a LOT more like engineering steps than "can this even work" steps, okay?

Re:Fusion energy breakthrough by Livermore Lab by whiplash451 on Monday December 12, 2022 @05:52PM (#33961636)
When your program compiles for the first time is usually when the real trouble starts.
Re:Fusion energy breakthrough by Livermore Lab by tstrimple on Monday December 12, 2022 @11:02PM (#33964679)
It's also when you can start iterating effectively.
Re:Fusion energy breakthrough by Livermore Lab by mastayoda on Tuesday December 13, 2022 @10:17AM (#33969938)
Damn right!! on the path to make actually do what it is supposed to do.
Re:Fusion energy breakthrough by Livermore Lab by tuatoru on Monday December 12, 2022 @08:00PM (#33963102)
For certain values of engineering steps.

Scaling up Qplasma from 1 to ~1000, and scaling up operating time from a microsecond to a megasecond are just two of them.

I have a feeling there is still some science to do.