News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on JPEG XL support has officially been removed from Chromium. Parent comment

Re:JPEG XL support has officially been removed from Chromium by mariusmg on Saturday December 10, 2022 @10:31AM (#33933417)
>experimental nature of JPEG-XL

I wonder what exactly they mean by this because JPEG-XL is a ISO standard. So if it's already standardized, how the heck is still "experimental" ?

https://www.iso.org/standard/77977.html

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:JPEG XL support has officially been removed from Chromium by JyrkiAlakuijala on Saturday December 10, 2022 @10:39AM (#33933484)
JPEG XL was implemented in Chrome behind a flag.

Other than that there is nothing experimental in JPEG XL.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:JPEG XL support has officially been removed from Chromium by simplotek on Saturday December 10, 2022 @12:11PM (#33934333)
> I wonder what exactly they mean by this because JPEG-XL is a ISO standard.

I see there's some confusion. A specification might be formalized in an international standard, but implementations of said standard can and often are experimental.

You don't magically turn code production-ready by having a committee sign off on a document.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:JPEG XL support has officially been removed from Chromium by masklinn on Saturday December 10, 2022 @02:10PM (#33935717)
> I wonder what exactly they mean by this because JPEG-XL is a ISO standard.

So were JPEG-XR and MJPEG2000.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:JPEG XL support has officially been removed from Chromium by quikee on Saturday December 10, 2022 @11:41PM (#33940165)
and neither of your examples is experimental
[ Parent | on HN ]