News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on End-to-end encrypted messages need more than libsignal. Parent comment

Re:End-to-end encrypted messages need more than libsignal by icelancer on Saturday December 10, 2022 @01:43AM (#33930526)
It's not compatible with FOSS from a dogmatic point of view, but I think it's a pragmatic way forward given how AWS and other actors act. I dual license my company's products in this manner.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:End-to-end encrypted messages need more than libsignal by sam_bristow on Saturday December 10, 2022 @02:23AM (#33930713)
Even Stallman isn't completely opposed to selling exceptions to copyleft licences.

https://www.fsf.org/blogs/rms/selling-exceptions

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:End-to-end encrypted messages need more than libsignal by icelancer on Saturday December 10, 2022 @08:18PM (#33938949)
Oh wow, I retract my statement then. I wasn't aware of this. I thought for sure RMS wouldn't approve.
[ Parent | on HN ]