Re:Why does the Commodore C128 perform poorly when running C...
by mixmastamyk on Friday December 09, 2022 @03:45PM
(#33926269)
I wasn't aware of this at the time, but they had AT&T Unix on them:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amiga_3000UX
$3400 in 1990 is pretty high, but I guess cheap for a "workstation." The average business would probably just suffer on a PC with DOS and Lotus 123 or something.
Re:Why does the Commodore C128 perform poorly when running C...
by kevin_thibedeau on Friday December 09, 2022 @04:05PM
(#33926443)
> The average business would probably just suffer on a PC with DOS and Lotus 123 or something.
386 PCs were going for $3500+ in 1990.
Re:Why does the Commodore C128 perform poorly when running C...
by mixmastamyk on Friday December 09, 2022 @08:54PM
(#33928979)
386 was five years old by that point, though you can spend as a much as you wanted of course.
But a 386 and graphics are not needed to do what I mentioned.
Re:Why does the Commodore C128 perform poorly when running C...
by kevin_thibedeau on Friday December 09, 2022 @09:04PM
(#33929044)
Prices didn't fall that quickly. 386s were premium until the 486 came along and $3500 is still a drop from the introductory pricing where they went for $5000. The 386 was an export controlled supercomputer and the market reflected that early on. 286's were the mid grade with 8086 still available for budget PCs.
This is another bit of Amiga lore that is a little spun. There was no space in the market for a 68030 Unix machine in 1992 though. Even SPARC's days were numbered. Not two years later we were all running Linux on Pentiums, and we never looked back.