Re:PG: What's your current take on reddit's comment system?
by Jd on Thursday July 12, 2007 @09:09PM
(#33942)
Alex, this is very interesting. Do you think there might be a way to get one's hands on the original? If there is a person/persons at Yahoo to contact I would do it, as this is something I have thought about quite a bit and would love to see more about the definitions of core, light, new, long-time, large and small.
You can email me if you like.
Re:PG: What's your current take on reddit's comment system?
by Alex3917 on Thursday July 12, 2007 @09:57PM
(#33954)
So I heard this talk at the Cornell Microsoft International Symposium on Self-Organizing Online Communities. The presentation was called "Implications for Future Research; Theory and Methods in Large Scale Analysis of Online Communities." And the three Yahoo presenters were Ravi Kumar, Andrew Tomkins, and Cameron Marlow. Not sure which one those three specifically, but I'm sure you could ask any of them.
I've developed this hobby of sneaking into academic conferences. It works best if when everyone else is wearing a suit and tie, you show up in shorts and a t-shirt. That way everyone just assumes that you're friends with one of the speakers, or else that you're Sergei Brin. :-)
Re:PG: What's your current take on reddit's comment system?
by Jd on Friday July 13, 2007 @10:36AM
(#34040)
At least one related paper is available online:
http://research.yahoo.com/publication/structure_and_evolutio...
I probably won't have time to read it until this evening, but will post then.
Re:PG: What's your current take on reddit's comment system?
by Jd on Friday July 13, 2007 @10:54PM
(#34159)
Yeah, this is mostly about speed of growth in social networks and only looks at Yahoo 360 and Flickr. I will keep looking for the original paper and post back if I find it.
Re:PG: What's your current take on reddit's comment system?
by whacked_new on Friday July 13, 2007 @12:48PM
(#34063)
I suspect these findings will apply to a certain type of "community." It does not, for example, apply easily to the wikipedia community.
What would be equally interesting as these findings, are the premises. What service, what content, what medium, what purpose, and extremely importantly, how presented.
1) Small groups have higher numbers of core users
2) Private and semi-public groups have higher numbers of core users than public groups
3) People in private groups remain in the core for longer
4) A user who is in the core of one group is more likely to become a member of the core when joining another group
5) New members who eventually become part of the core are more likely to receive messages from other users who have been long-time core users
6) New members who eventually become light users are more likely to receive messages from other light users, if they receive replies at all.
This suggests some strategies for building a strong group of core users to transmit social norms. For example, having an idea of who the core users are in other similar communities and making a special effort to reach out to them if they visit your site.
Unhappily I lost the original paper and all I have are my notes, so I don't know exactly how they defined the core users offhand.