News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Twitter Files Part 2: Twitter's Secret Blacklists by bavell on Friday December 09, 2022 @01:19AM (#33918184)
Right, Twitter provided their own definition which delicately tiptoes around the unsavory issue and Weiss expanded the definition to suit her own self-interests.

How does that make what "most people" would consider not matter? Seems like a non-sequitur to me but maybe I'm not understanding your point.

Re:The Twitter Files Part 2: Twitter's Secret Blacklists by rhaksw on Friday December 09, 2022 @03:49AM (#33919131)
Agreed, it's rare for any service to outright say "we shadow ban" as done here [1] for example.

And, most services still use a form of shadow moderation [2]. So it's perfectly fine to discuss here. Attempts to shut down conversation are just that.

[1] https://getstream.io/blog/feature-announcement-shadow-ban/

[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33916414

Re:The Twitter Files Part 2: Twitter's Secret Blacklists by tptacek on Friday December 09, 2022 @01:26AM (#33918226)
Because the thread is about Weiss's claims. If you want to talk about how Twitter's definition of shadow-banning is problematic, or their moderation practices in general, start another top-level thread.