News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: How much longer will we have free access to ChatGPT? by goertzen on Thursday December 08, 2022 @10:49PM (#33917196)
These models are awesome but releasing them in the wild (I.e. not sandboxed) seems really irresponsible.

I hope these modes are prohibitively expensive to train so we can figure out a way to release them responsibly when they can be open.

Re:Ask HN: How much longer will we have free access to ChatGPT? by seydor on Friday December 09, 2022 @10:23AM (#33922216)
What is irresponsible is not teaching the public what is coming. The press is currently not doing a good job of explaining what chatGPT is and how it works so that people can assess what to expect of it. The adoption and evolution of these systems will probably hit people like a ton of bricks in 2023.
Re:Ask HN: How much longer will we have free access to ChatGPT? by wilcanfly on Saturday December 10, 2022 @01:50PM (#33935499)
Just curious, in a brief couple sentences of what do you think the first disruptive impacts to occur will be?
Re:Ask HN: How much longer will we have free access to ChatGPT? by oceanplexian on Friday December 09, 2022 @05:53AM (#33919955)
I’m not sure I understand irresponsible vs. responsible in this context. Putting this in the hands of a few for-profit corporations but not releasing it to the open source community sounds extremely irresponsible.
Re:Ask HN: How much longer will we have free access to ChatGPT? by jerpint on Friday December 09, 2022 @12:09AM (#33917707)
What would you define as responsible vs. Irresponsible?
Re:Ask HN: How much longer will we have free access to ChatGPT? by bheadmaster on Friday December 09, 2022 @08:38AM (#33921068)
I assume along the lines of

    irresponsible = released to the public full of evil <insert slur here>

    responsible = kept in the walled garden of good <insert corp here>