News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fermilab/CERN recommendation for Linux distribution by 1letterunixname on Thursday December 08, 2022 @02:46AM (#33905347)
Correct. Although I don't think Rocky has nearly as much money, staff, or industry support as Alma does.

The other issue is RH gets Cent 8/9 Stream CVE fixes out faster than either Alma or Rocky, at least so far.

Re:Fermilab/CERN recommendation for Linux distribution by ustrin on Thursday December 08, 2022 @03:22AM (#33905616)
> The problem is that Cent 8/9 Stream has quicker critical CVE patches because it's essentially the source and is closer to mirroring RHEL.

This isn't entirely true, at least for embargoed CVEs (so the most critical vulnerabilities). RHEL will always get embargoed patches first. Once RHEL releases the patched packages, Alma/Rocky can rebuild them too. The patches may not be available in Stream yet at this point. This has happened a few times in the past.

Also, there are no advisories for Stream, so it's not always easy to tell if a Stream package includes a patch for a particular CVE. Sometimes you have to go hunting in the changelog to figure it out, as the version numbers don't always match with RHEL's.

Re:Fermilab/CERN recommendation for Linux distribution by worthless-trash on Thursday December 08, 2022 @07:23AM (#33907106)
Hello fellow redhatter in the kernel engineering group ;)
Re:Fermilab/CERN recommendation for Linux distribution by ustrin on Thursday December 08, 2022 @11:00AM (#33909329)
Actually, I'm closer to the OP than to Red Hat, but I've heard this point explained often enough :P
Re:Fermilab/CERN recommendation for Linux distribution by worthless-trash on Friday December 09, 2022 @09:32AM (#33921551)
you -nailed- it.