Spoken like a true defender of technical incompetence.

Erroneous labeling only distracts from any further argument.

When the author clearly doesn't even know/understand the difference between "pesticide" and "herbicide", why trust/bother with anything further they have to say?

Monsanto may well be a disciple of Satan but a proven lack of basic insight on the issue doesn't help validate the opinion.

Herbicide is a subclass of pesticide.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pesticide

> Pesticides are substances that are meant to control pests.[1] This includes herbicide, insecticide, nematicide, molluscicide, piscicide, avicide, rodenticide, bactericide, insect repellent, animal repellent, microbicide, fungicide, and lampricide.

I stand corrected.

Still, "herbicide" is a more specific and accurate description of Roundup.

You are still intentionally ignoring any and all spillover effects of an herbicide into other types of -cides.

Disregarding a 100 page report because it uses "pesticide" as the general term containing both actual pesticides and herbicides seem disingenuous.

Page volume in scientific reporting is not at all an indicator of quality or validity. Disclaimer: I haven't read the report yet. Just sayin'

Agreed but the conciseness of volume evidence body despite "misuse" of the -icde suffix should not discount all of the article.