News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Caterpillar offers phone with built-in FLIR camera by dotancohen on Wednesday December 07, 2022 @03:45AM (#33892106)
mAh is perfectly fine for a first-order comparison of two competing batteries, because those two batteries will only compete for a specific workload if they have the same voltage. If I need a phone with a large battery, and all phones are 3.8 volts (yes, I do mean 3.7-4.2) then comparing mAh is useful, (assuming background battery usage of the two devices is similar, which actually isn't often true, but that's a different issue).
Re:Caterpillar offers phone with built-in FLIR camera by masklinn on Wednesday December 07, 2022 @06:21AM (#33893124)
> mAh is perfectly fine for a first-order comparison of two competing batteries

And yet it’s still dumb, because the actual energy density would let you make the exact same comparison anyway, and it would allow for easier comparison with other battery types or contexts.

> If I need a phone with a large battery, and all phones are 3.8 volts (yes, I do mean 3.7-4.2) then comparing mAh is useful

It’s not, there’s a >10% difference between the top and the bottom of the range.

Just give actual energy values, it’s strictly more useful.

Re:Caterpillar offers phone with built-in FLIR camera by dwighttk on Wednesday December 07, 2022 @06:58AM (#33893378)
Advertisers don’t care about useful. Many customers see mWh and mAh and think “that’s probably the same… and look! this one has thousands of em!”
Re:Caterpillar offers phone with built-in FLIR camera by masklinn on Wednesday December 07, 2022 @07:19AM (#33893486)
Weirdly this doesn’t even hold, every battery is more than 1V so the Wh is always larger than the Ah. Makes no sense.