News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Using ChatGPT as a Co-Founder by ytwySXpMbS on Monday December 05, 2022 @09:49AM (#33866319)
I'm assuming this comment was written by ChatGPT, am I correct? It's got quite a predictable writing style, and also your comment doesn't add anything to the original, it's just reworded
Re:Using ChatGPT as a Co-Founder by iamflimflam1 on Monday December 05, 2022 @10:09AM (#33866595)
Interesting, I wonder if people will modify how they write to avoid appearing as an AI.
Re:Using ChatGPT as a Co-Founder by TillE on Monday December 05, 2022 @12:32PM (#33868719)
Most people don't start a reply by restating the thing they're replying to. It's a dead giveaway of this particular model.

Good writers also don't waste time with fluffy platitudes that convey little meaning or merely state the obvious.

Re:Using ChatGPT as a Co-Founder by kybernetyk on Monday December 05, 2022 @09:50AM (#33866337)
yes :)
Re:Using ChatGPT as a Co-Founder by cesarvarela on Monday December 05, 2022 @07:20PM (#33874025)
Oh man, now I'll have to always keep in my head the notion that I might be reading AI generated comments.
Re:Using ChatGPT as a Co-Founder by UncleMeat on Tuesday December 06, 2022 @09:41AM (#33880637)
I don't think this deserves a smiley face. I'm hoping for a rapid crackdown on ML-generated comments either via explicit rules or cultural norms.
Re:Using ChatGPT as a Co-Founder by baandam on Monday December 05, 2022 @12:47PM (#33868940)
How about this instead from ChatGPT?

"Indeed, AI's ability to make mistakes is what makes it so useful in generative fields like art and poetry, while its lack of mistakes is what makes it essential for tasks like driving."