Re:Elephants born without tusks in ‘evolutionary response’ t...
by nverno on Monday December 05, 2022 @03:39AM
(#33862996)
It is pedantic, but I see how 'response' here lends agency to evolution, and could be interpreted as implying an intelligent process, as mentioned above.
Re:Elephants born without tusks in ‘evolutionary response’ t...
by Ygg2 on Monday December 05, 2022 @03:47AM
(#33863058)
Same way any inanimate system can respond. Think of it more like action/reaction than anything else. I.e. there is no agency just a set of interacting rules.
Re:Elephants born without tusks in ‘evolutionary response’ t...
by nverno on Monday December 05, 2022 @04:01AM
(#33863145)
Yea, I think the original wording is fine, although I'd think of it more like the elephant genes are a river that got dammed, so the river started flowing around. Saying the river responded to the dam would be similar.
Yes. That's how evolution works. Your genes are randomized during life/mating.
Due to selection pressure one variation is favored over the other. That's evolution.
So in evolutionary response to poachers elephants evolve no tusks.