News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Cognitive ability is a powerful predictor of political to... by pessimizer on Sunday December 04, 2022 @04:22PM (#33858029)
This is where Bob claims to be an expert on Alice's motives (the motives that all people with her opinion secretly have), refuses to further participate in any discussions that allow Alice to contribute, and accuses anyone else who allows Alice to participate of carrying water for trickle-down economics, racial superiority, social spending, flat earthism, the divine right of kings, debt-to-GDP ratio-hacking, systemd, etc etc.

edit: not begging the question is literal racism.

Re:Cognitive ability is a powerful predictor of political to... by revolvingocelot on Sunday December 04, 2022 @06:04PM (#33858989)
Refusing to bow down to false premises is not claiming to be an expert on anyone's motives, but I sure think that insisting that false premises disguised as hypotheticals are meaningful contributions to support any conclusion is wrong as hell. That's right, I said it -- defending a conclusion based on made-up facts is wrong as hell. Yes, I'm willing to die on this hill, I guess I'm just old-fashioned in my desire to discuss reality...
Re:Cognitive ability is a powerful predictor of political to... by ajuc on Monday December 05, 2022 @04:25AM (#33863303)
Do you believe there's a last prime number? Do you accept Gödel's incompleteness theorems?
Re:Cognitive ability is a powerful predictor of political to... by revolvingocelot on Monday December 05, 2022 @01:56PM (#33870094)
Do either of those rest on "defending a conclusion based on made-up facts"? I don't think, say, proofs-by-contradiction are really comparable to the bad-faith "let's say, hypothetically" argumentative style under discussion.