> Overall this data collection was being done in a privacy respecting way

and yet, I read

> Luzzi had claimed the devices were secure and the data encrypted, but Privacy Institute students learned they were relatively insecure and unencrypted

...

> Which is illegal since it isn't their property.

and yet, I read

> deployed without IRB approval even though human subjects were at the center of the so-called study

For me, this is was perhaps the most important message,

> many members of the computer science department were also in a union, and thus networked together for a quick mass response.