News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Twitter Files by gregw2 on Saturday December 03, 2022 @07:19AM (#33842923)
This post too is arguably misinformation, selectively reporting the findings that would cause you to distrust the laptop and not reporting the reasons to trust various things on the laptop.

You could also summarize the findings as “no evidence of tampered emails or hacking was found on the laptop”. But you didn’t (and I wouldn’t) as that too would be disingenuous.

Neither summary is a fair framing, particularly for techies.

For at least some of the details, see the Washington Post article: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-... or https://archive.ph/b1Ser

Re:The Twitter Files by lyu07282 on Saturday December 03, 2022 @12:12PM (#33845052)
My post? It was basically a summary of Wikipedia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter_Biden_laptop_controvers...

But let me guess Wikipedia is also part of the fake news media?

Re:The Twitter Files by sjwalter on Saturday December 03, 2022 @01:07PM (#33845708)
According to the founder of Wikipedia, yes, Wikipedia has been captured by leftist interests.

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2020/05/26/wikipedia-co-found...

Re:The Twitter Files by gregw2 on Saturday December 03, 2022 @04:10PM (#33847392)
I don’t follow this closely, but the Wikipedia article is way more biased and selective in its summary/presentation of facts than the Washington Post article I linked to.
Re:The Twitter Files by throwaway35i2 on Saturday December 03, 2022 @11:44PM (#33850693)
This isn't a primary source (there are no links to the raw data for analysis) here so this post too is arguably misinformation, as it's selectively reporting findings.