Re:The Twitter Files
by 454544545 on Saturday December 03, 2022 @07:18AM
(#33842912)
This is confirmed by Garcetti 2006:
> that because his statements were made pursuant to his position as a public employee, rather than as a private citizen, his speech had no First Amendment protection.
> that because his statements were made pursuant to his position as a public employee, rather than as a private citizen, his speech had no First Amendment protection.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garcetti_v._Ceballos