News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Twitter Files by toofy on Saturday December 03, 2022 @12:46AM (#33841011)
i'd have to go back again and reread, but was the term "handle" used at all? i remember them asking to "review" some tweets and to measure them against the tos. i very easily could have missed them asking to "handle" it though...

i think those semantics matter, which is why i ask.

Re:The Twitter Files by andreyk on Saturday December 03, 2022 @01:54AM (#33841333)
They did not ask to handle it, the person from Twitter replied "handled" (to another person at Twitter, for the record). It's in the screenshot of the email with the request.
Re:The Twitter Files by toofy on Saturday December 03, 2022 @02:07AM (#33841398)
yeah, that’s what i thought i read, thanks.

no outside person asked twitter to “handle” anything. they asked them to review it.

Re:The Twitter Files by cwkoss on Saturday December 03, 2022 @07:16PM (#33849019)
All Twitter users have the power to report tweets.

It seems like at minimum they are bypassing the reported tweet queue.

It feels likely that these report judgements disproportionately had the outcome desired by the requester. If not all requested tweets got taken down/suspended until deleted that will look a lot better than if this channel effectively allowed unchecked censorship.

Re:The Twitter Files by mfost on Sunday December 04, 2022 @07:54AM (#33853261)
> It feels likely that these report judgements disproportionately had the outcome desired by the requester

It's not a hard outcome to achieve. Only report things blatantly violating the ToS and you get that outcome.