Re:People tricking ChatGPT “like watching an Asimov novel co...
by underwater on Friday December 02, 2022 @05:07PM
(#33837597)
People solve this by getting the GPT to describe a series of computations and then running those steps externally (e.g. asking GPT what Python code to run).
Thats not so different from how humans do this. When we need to add or multiply we switch from freeform thought to executing the Maths programs that were uploaded into our brains at school.
Re:People tricking ChatGPT “like watching an Asimov novel co...
by squirrel on Friday December 02, 2022 @07:51PM
(#33839052)
If I recall correctly, in his paper on whether machines could think, Turing gives an imaginary dialogue with a computer trying to pass as a human (what we later came to call the Turing test) where the judge poses an arithmetic problem, and the computer replies after a pause of 30 seconds — with the wrong answer.
A good idea when dismissing those machine learning models is to check whether a human would pass your standards. I miss the aspect when the dismissive "they only interpolate or memorise" arguments come. I am also quite bounded by my knowledge or what I have seen. Describe something I have never seen to me and ask me to draw it, I would fail in a quite hilarious way.
Hilariously, ChatGPT is also quite bad at arithmetic, like myself. I thought this is what machines are supposed to be good at!