Re:People tricking ChatGPT “like watching an Asimov novel co...
by krackers on Friday December 02, 2022 @01:53PM
(#33835002)
That's like saying the novels people write are just rearrangements of words we learned as a kid. I don't see how you can't possibly consider something like this [1] as extrapolation and genuine creation.
[1] https://twitter.com/pic/orig/media%2FFi4HMw9WQAA3j-m.jpg
Re:People tricking ChatGPT “like watching an Asimov novel co...
by renewiltord on Friday December 02, 2022 @02:04PM
(#33835173)
link broken
Re:People tricking ChatGPT “like watching an Asimov novel co...
by krackers on Friday December 02, 2022 @07:39PM
(#33838961)
Re:People tricking ChatGPT “like watching an Asimov novel co...
by visarga on Friday December 02, 2022 @03:16PM
(#33836262)
Exactly, interpolation in combinatorial space becomes extrapolation.
Re:People tricking ChatGPT “like watching an Asimov novel co...
by Filligree on Friday December 02, 2022 @02:01PM
(#33835114)
You need about ten pictures for Dreambooth to give Stable Diffusion a good idea of what a new character looks like.
Re:People tricking ChatGPT “like watching an Asimov novel co...
by seydor on Friday December 02, 2022 @03:24PM
(#33836384)
extrapolation is interpolation between things that haven't been interpolated before, so i wouldnt be so sure about it. Its objective is not to go after unfamiliar routes, but it can be trained to do so
For example, if a new comic/movie/video game character came out tomorrow that had a very unique physical look, Stable Diffusion would have difficulty even approximating it (i.e. its training data wouldn't have what was needed to reproduce the appearance.) But it can produce a decent Darth Vader because it's probably been fed at least thousands of drawings/photos of this very well known fictional character.