News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:John Carmack trying to get a bunch of GPUs on Google Cloud by mirker on Friday December 02, 2022 @12:36AM (#33827209)
It’s plausible to do what you’re saying. I still think it’s more trouble than it’s worth. If you somehow managed to engineer everything perfectly and tune it as you say, you’d still have customers who wanted their service to stay online past overcharge. I’d think the predominant business case for such tight guarantees would be small and low budget projects. Additionally, every cloud vendor who doesn’t do this seems to be cheaper, so you’d be priced out (in a commodity market).
Re:John Carmack trying to get a bunch of GPUs on Google Cloud by dwild on Friday December 02, 2022 @11:29AM (#33832669)
> you’d still have customers who wanted their service to stay online past overcharge

Then they wouldn't configure overcharge limit, would they?

Re:John Carmack trying to get a bunch of GPUs on Google Cloud by mirker on Friday December 02, 2022 @03:38PM (#33836557)
I mean, why not? I have alerts on cost in my cloud usage corresponding to orders of magnitude increases in expected cost. If they trigger a few hours faster (more accurately) that’s good. But I don’t see what I would do bar shutting down the service, so my argument is that it’s not really a feature that would make a difference for most use cases. And if your service is steady, you can already do a linear extrapolation from yesterday’s costs to see if you’d go over budget.