News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Stable Diffusion with Core ML on Apple Silicon. Parent comment

Re:Stable Diffusion with Core ML on Apple Silicon by EMIRELADERO on Thursday December 01, 2022 @08:17PM (#33825515)
What part of the SD license prohibits that?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stable Diffusion with Core ML on Apple Silicon by ronsor on Thursday December 01, 2022 @09:18PM (#33825901)
No part of it.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stable Diffusion with Core ML on Apple Silicon by judge2020 on Friday December 02, 2022 @12:22AM (#33827120)
I mean, it is a legal time bomb in general[0], with a non-standard license that has special stipulations in an amendment. Do you really incur the weeks of lead time that it would take Legal to review the legality of redistributing this model?

0: https://github.com/CompVis/stable-diffusion/blob/main/LICENS...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stable Diffusion with Core ML on Apple Silicon by zerohp on Friday December 02, 2022 @12:45AM (#33827273)
Redistributing that model to end users that violate Attachment A seems like a minefield.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stable Diffusion with Core ML on Apple Silicon by EMIRELADERO on Friday December 02, 2022 @08:27AM (#33830139)
Not really. You're not responsible for how users use products you distribute. The license is passed along to them, they would be the ones violating it.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stable Diffusion with Core ML on Apple Silicon by zerohp on Friday December 02, 2022 @09:52AM (#33831187)
Are you an attorney?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stable Diffusion with Core ML on Apple Silicon by EMIRELADERO on Friday December 02, 2022 @10:48AM (#33832065)
No, I'm not. If you have supporting precedent for your position (that a licensor can be held liable for the unpreventable actions of a licensee) I would like to see it.
[ Parent | on HN ]