EFF Takes a Stance: San Francisco Shouldn’t Arm Robots

Re:EFF Takes a Stance: San Francisco Shouldn’t Arm Robots by user3939382 on Thursday December 01, 2022 @11:31AM (#33818575)

Because this post is another example where they always make themselves out to be the good guys but they have an agenda like anyone else.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:EFF Takes a Stance: San Francisco Shouldn’t Arm Robots by marcinzm on Thursday December 01, 2022 @11:38AM (#33818687)

So what is your argument in this case? That no one is allowed to portray themselves as the good guy unless they're 100% perceived as good by everyone?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:EFF Takes a Stance: San Francisco Shouldn’t Arm Robots by 2OEH8eoCRo0 on Thursday December 01, 2022 @11:38AM (#33818694)

What is wrong with their argument?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:EFF Takes a Stance: San Francisco Shouldn’t Arm Robots by johnhenry on Thursday December 01, 2022 @11:43AM (#33818796)

Healthy skepticism is always good, but are there organizations that go out of their way to make themselves not look like "good guys"?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:EFF Takes a Stance: San Francisco Shouldn’t Arm Robots by wan_ala on Thursday December 01, 2022 @01:41PM (#33820595)

Having opinions on dystopian armed robots != being a bad organisation. Also isn't being pro-privacy an agenda too? They have always opposed the US government.

[ Parent | on HN ]