Re:The sad history of Unicode printf-style format specifiers...
by vintermann on Thursday December 01, 2022 @11:02AM
(#33818068)
They couldn't just jump on every technically superior idea, because compatibility is a thing too. And, by the time everyone agreed that utf-8 was preferable, compatibility with their own stuff, which is always especially painful.
It's not as if they were the only ones. I had a lot of utf-related pain in the Linux terminal back in the day.
Vi and Emacs took a long time to handle variable length encodings well. My old Unix editor of choice, NEdit, never managed the switch at all.
I got a mail from my boss in utf-7 once. God knows how that happened.
It's not as if they were the only ones. I had a lot of utf-related pain in the Linux terminal back in the day.
Vi and Emacs took a long time to handle variable length encodings well. My old Unix editor of choice, NEdit, never managed the switch at all.
I got a mail from my boss in utf-7 once. God knows how that happened.