News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Spotify CEO renews attack on Apple after Musk's salvo by williamscales on Thursday December 01, 2022 @12:03AM (#33812556)
What does “tampered with” mean? Particularly in the context of a device you own?

I would consider a device tampered with if someone besides me (the owner) did something with it, without my authorization. But anything short of that is surely just me using the device. I mean, I have physical possession after all.

Re:Spotify CEO renews attack on Apple after Musk's salvo by hparadiz on Thursday December 01, 2022 @12:09AM (#33812588)
Signing images and requiring that the bootloader can't flash anything else is just vendor lock in / ceding your power as an end user. It doesn't make you more secure in any way since a bad actor will figure out a way to bypass making writes to the system partition.
Re:Spotify CEO renews attack on Apple after Musk's salvo by moonchrome on Thursday December 01, 2022 @04:26AM (#33814120)
Umm I remember ordering Chinese phones way back when (think android 4) with unlocked boot loaders - both had some random junk installed via custom ROM and you couldn't uninstall it.
Re:Spotify CEO renews attack on Apple after Musk's salvo by tremon on Thursday December 01, 2022 @04:51AM (#33814280)
It's a good thing they had unlocked boot loaders then, or you would not have had any option to remove the malware.