News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:FTX’s Collapse Was a Crime, Not an Accident by lmm on Wednesday November 30, 2022 @11:35PM (#33812378)
> For example, if I deposit on Charles Schwab, is the cash held in my Schwab account used as capital for margin loans to other Schwab customers? I would think not (unless I'm misunderstanding how finance works). Like of course the money is probably lent out like banks do, but FDIC insured banks have rules about what types of things they can lend money to, right?

Traditionally, lending deposits out as loans (especially mortgages) was seen as the most important thing that banks did, their core function. Nowadays things are more abstract and regulations are different, but it wouldn't surprise me if margin loans could still be at least partly funded (at least in an abstract capital-ratio sense) from deposits.

Re:FTX’s Collapse Was a Crime, Not an Accident by dublinben on Thursday December 01, 2022 @02:26PM (#33821373)
FTX was a brokerage though, not a bank. While banks may be inherently allowed to accept and lend out customer funds, brokerages seem to be largely forbidden from doing so.[0] SBF appeared to act as if the typical rules of operating a security brokerage didn't apply to FTX 'because crypto.'

[0] https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/rulebooks/finra-rules/3...

Re:FTX’s Collapse Was a Crime, Not an Accident by zucker42 on Friday December 02, 2022 @07:34AM (#33829695)
My assumption was that depository banks are limited in what sorts of investements they can make, but maybe I'm wrong in that assumption.