Re:A long expected update (probablistic programming langauge...
by akozak on Wednesday November 30, 2022 @06:29PM
(#33809578)
Oh yea, but funny enough a lot of the critiques were shared via the internal version of Google+ since people actually took the time to write things. I don't think it's a great comparison to Meta ... this is anecdotal, but it felt plausible enough as a product strategy and in a self contained org that I think most rank and file gave it breathing room and tried to be constructive (save for a few cases where they'd made some bad calls). Keep in mind it was a period of huge growth and experimentation across the company, so there was a lot to feel positive about even if you were skeptical of Google+, and it didn't feel like they'd bet the farm, in the same way it might at Meta.
Re:A long expected update (probablistic programming langauge...
by rippercushions on Wednesday November 30, 2022 @06:12PM
(#33809373)
Memegen predates Google+. And there were lots of people loudly saying that the emperor has no clothes, but the VP in charge didn't care and many mandates forcing people to work on G+ were issued anyway.
Re:A long expected update (probablistic programming langauge...
by hn_go_brrrrr on Thursday December 01, 2022 @02:59AM
(#33813563)
You don't have to work on G+. No one is forcing you.
(Oh wait, yes they were.)
Re:A long expected update (probablistic programming langauge...
by endtime on Wednesday November 30, 2022 @09:26PM
(#33811509)
Before. I made a Memegen meme about ten years ago comparing the sign in with G+ buttons to the classic Wikipedia Jimmy Wales begging-for-donations banners, and for many years it was one of the top 100 Memegen memes ever.
Too lazy to check, but did memegen appear before or after the whole Google+ debacle? Because from the outside Google did seem to drink a lot of its own Kool-aid back then (before and during the first stages of the Google+ launch).
In a way, the current discussions around VR remind me of those times, lots and lots of smart people refusing to say that the emperor has no clothes, for one reason or another.