Re:Why We Haven’t Met Any Aliens
by bluekeybox on Thursday December 22, 2011 @12:14AM
(#3380488)
The most useful hypothesis: we are the first, and the galaxy is ours for taking. Now let's get back to work.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why We Haven’t Met Any Aliens
by ballstothewalls on Thursday December 22, 2011 @01:08AM
(#3380607)
This is completely legitimate, right? There must be a most advanced civilization. Why can't we be it?
Yes, that's possible. It just goes against the Copernican Principle (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copernican_principle), and that's why many people are not happy with that explanation.
Well... Someone always wins the lottery.
You can also twist it around: if we were the first ones, what would we see?
One can also imagine the window between the dawn of technology and becoming undetectable is short enough the odds of finding a peer are very small.
Re:Why We Haven’t Met Any Aliens
by bluekeybox on Thursday December 22, 2011 @10:09AM
(#3381717)
There's also Anthropic Principle (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropic_principle) which states pretty much the opposite to what the Copernican says.