Yeah, this appears to have stopped, but was somewhat common a few years ago. My standard response was 'you called me, tell me who you are and I will call back on the official line'. They couldn't object to that. It was obviously some plan to 'ensure user privacy' that once it became known to one or two people with the authority to do something about it and the knowledge to know better it was quashed.
Now if only they would allow you to enable 2FA options that aren't SMS and also disable SMS. They don't understand that SMS is a terrible 2FA system isn't mitigated by 'but you can enable other things' if you cannot remove SMS as an option.
* https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/05/thiev...
* https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2018/08/passw...
On the website:
1. you input a user ID
2. you input a password or PIN
3. you press a button that sends a SMS with an OTP code to the registered cellular number
4. you input this OTP code on the site
Even if someone can intercept the SMS, they wouldn't (shouldn't) have ID and PIN.
For another, what's the point in having 2FA if one of the factors is completely insecure? It's just an annoyance at that point, and a good way to ... tie your account to your phone number, which just coincidentally happens to be the primary key for most advertising tracking services. What a coincidence
It doesn't have any security benefit for phishing like this, it's just one additional password input field.
Not true. FIDO and prevents this. The key is bound to the site you authorized it on, so inputting the key while connected to a phishing site will do nothing.
The entire point of two-factor authentication is to provide an extra layer of security for when the first layer is compromised.
Having the possibility/capability of intercepting the SMS is only effective if the ID and PIN are already known, and while surely there are "other" ways to get them, the attacker needs all three.
From what I have read/seen, most if not all successful attempts to access someone else's bank account online go through some form of phishing.
The SIMjacking is the last barrier to access.
In most cases people reuse passwords and their login/password are known via any number of a million dumps of large websites whose dbs have been breached.
The NIST actually has great guidelines for digital identity authentication:
* https://pages.nist.gov/800-63-3/sp800-63-3.html
Don't blame the government -- they outlined an ideal way to do it on many levels of need. Blame the specific people who implemented that specific system.
"Yes, I hear you typing in the PIN"
Oho, but that's a bit of security hole, isn't it?
"It's just beeps though, I can't tell what you typed"
Yeah but someone suitably skilled *could*, is my point!
"Yeah but it's just beeps, like this <beep beep beep beep>"
Okay and you typed 1 3 5 8.
"Uhhh... oh. Yes, I did. Uh, how did you do that?"
I've got an ear for it. This is absolutely not a criticism of you in any way and thanks for helping me demonstrate it, but could you get your supervisor to play this call to their manager and get back to me, once we're done with the call?
"Yes, I'll do that"
Awesome! Now these bank transfers...
They didn't call me back, but now call handlers transfer you to a totally different service to put a PIN in.
A few years ago my bank would ring me up every couple of weeks and say "Hi, I am calling from your bank, we want to talk to Doctor Eval(), can you please verify your date of birth and we can get started?". They would get so pissed off when I wouldn't tell them. I was like, "how do I know you're from my bank?". (Banks seem to have stopped doing this now).
For companies which should be putting security at the centre of their business, they apparently have no idea that they're normalising phishing.