Re:UK ditches ban on 'legal but harmful' online content in f...
by alvah on Tuesday November 29, 2022 @08:03PM
(#33795580)
"Trump repeatedly stated that the point of the ban was to ban Muslims from entering the country."
Do you have a citation for this? I’m no fan of Trump, but that’s not what I remember.
Re:UK ditches ban on 'legal but harmful' online content in f...
by Manuel_D on Tuesday November 29, 2022 @08:13PM
(#33795656)
He called for “a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/01/28/mi...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_13769#Trump_ca...
Re:UK ditches ban on 'legal but harmful' online content in f...
by alvah on Tuesday November 29, 2022 @08:54PM
(#33795948)
Fair enough - this was pre-election but still inexcusable. I didn't think he had explicitly called the 2017 travel ban a ban on Muslims, and I haven't seen anything to suggest he did.
> As the Muslim ban went into effect on Saturday, lawyers from the ACLU-WA and the NW Immigrant Rights Project rushed to SeaTac Airport to help immigrants on incoming flights who were being denied entry to the U.S.
Kind of hard to take this seriously, when your own source contradicts you. As an analogy, conservatives talk about gun bans in California and New York yet bolt action rifles remain legal there. Not every gun is banned, so it's wrong to call it a "gun ban"?
> Let me ask you how do you feel about the government labeling and suppressing misinformation?
They shouldn't and the fact that said governments are democracies doesn't make it any less authoritarian.