News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Balenciaga Controversy by dsfyu404ed on Tuesday November 29, 2022 @11:55AM (#33790015)
>Sorry, which shooting was that? Hard to keep track here in the US.

The one you just cited, obviously.

The point is that you are either misinformed, speculating as it suits you, or lying to present that shooting as being motivated by moral panic type politics because it has since come out that the shooter did not subscribe to those beliefs.

And as much as it pains me to agree with you I concur that the shooter's gender and father's occupation are irrelevant.

Re:The Balenciaga Controversy by p0pcult on Tuesday November 29, 2022 @12:18PM (#33790334)
Re:The Balenciaga Controversy by dsfyu404ed on Tuesday November 29, 2022 @02:38PM (#33792175)
Yes, everyone knows how radicalization works. It's a well trodden path.

The problem here is that in two separate comment subthreads you are acting as though the purveyors of moral panic are radicalizing people to shoot up gay bars when in reality they're 0-2 if that is indeed their goal.

Stop it. Stop lying.

Re:The Balenciaga Controversy by p0pcult on Tuesday November 29, 2022 @03:03PM (#33792496)
0 for 2 means theyre not successful, not that theyre not trying.