News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Stable Diffusion 2.0 and the Importance of Negative Prompts for Good Results. Parent comment

Re:Stable Diffusion 2.0 and the Importance of Negative Promp... by Agentlien on Tuesday November 29, 2022 @01:19AM (#33784259)
I did some tests on SD 1.5 with certain challenging prompts such as gymnasts doing a handstand. Using no negative prompt they became amorphous blobs. I'm guessing because gymnasts are often in dynamic poses which are hard for SD to understand.

I decided to add a negative prompt. With a bit of experimentation I realised all the "bad" had no effect. However, "blob" actually made most of the deformities go away and "amputee" did help against partial limbs being generated.

Something that worked even better was replacing "gymnast" with "athletic man"/"athletic woman" in the positive prompt.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stable Diffusion 2.0 and the Importance of Negative Promp... by visarga on Tuesday November 29, 2022 @03:13AM (#33784916)
Welcome to the latent space where you can add, subtract and operate on words like they are mathematical objects. I suppose people are going to intuitively learn how the latent space works by exercising prompts.
[ Parent | on HN ]